Multi-agent orchestration: worker-observer pairs, helper-runner handoffs, siloed pre-prediction. For workflows where the model has to reliably reason across stages — and where a single chat-window gets confused, drops state, or hallucinates the middle steps.
A single agent in a long conversation drops state. Multi-step work fails halfway.
You've tried it: ask one Claude conversation to research a topic, synthesize the findings, and write a draft. The first part is great. The middle drifts. By step three the model has lost the thread, hallucinated a citation, and the output is unusable.
Then you try chaining prompts manually. Now it's your head holding the state — and the throughput drops to what you can keep track of in a notepad.
Composition is the fix. Decompose the workflow into discrete agent roles. Each agent owns one phase, with a structured input schema and a structured output schema. The handoff is a contract, not a hope.
Add siloed observers: each one watches one specific agent, pre-predicts what should happen, and flags drift when it doesn't. Quality assurance is part of the mechanism, not a separate pass.
Every multi-agent build composes these four primitives. The variation is what each agent does — not the architecture.
Owns one phase of the workflow. Receives structured input, produces structured output, never sees the full pipeline state. Eyes on the road.
Assigned to one agent. Works independently — no cross-talk with other observers. Watches start to finish. Flags drift in a structured report.
Materializes tools and context for the worker at the moment they're needed. Hands off, dissolves, returns to the bench. The worker never breaks focus.
Routes work between agents according to the composition graph. Manages state, handoff schemas, error envelopes. The only role that sees the full pipeline.
Our coordination principle: workers stay focused on the work. Helpers materialize the exact tool the worker needs, hand it off without breaking stride, and dissolve. Observers watch silently and report later. The team you compose feels like a relay race, not a meeting.
Every composition we ship visibly carries this principle — and the QA observer pattern that pairs with it. Architecture visible end-to-end. Capabilities that compound.
Pick by composition complexity. Two agents at Entry. Three or four with observers at Standard. Full crew with siloed pre-prediction at Premium.
A small editorial team producing 8–10 articles per month — limited not by writing capacity but by the research bottleneck. Every article required a researcher to produce a structured brief before a writer could begin. The handoff was manual, inconsistent, frequently lost in context-switching across tools.
The composition: a Researcher agent ingests a topic prompt and produces a structured evidence brief. A Synthesizer agent digests that brief and produces a narrative skeleton with argument sequencing. A Writer agent drafts the article from the skeleton, preserving source citations.
Each agent runs in sequence with a structured handoff schema — output of one is the validated input of the next. Full source provenance on every article. An editorial checklist and a source provenance manifest are appended to every output as standard. The pipeline is theirs to extend.
Submit the form. Scoping call within 24 hours. We'll diagram the composition graph and confirm agent count before any payment.